8/30/2023 0 Comments Nytimes front page oct 2018![]() If that was Raniere’s plan from the start, then Mr. Raniere does not condone branding or collecting material to coerce students’ silence.” ![]() Raniere would never expect them or their wives to be branded or provide material that could be used to blackmail them. Raniere does not approve of DOS’ practices - and DOS has nothing to do with his teaching organizations, ESP, J’ness, or the Society of Protectors. Miss Mack and other members devised and created the group without consulting with Mr. Miss Mack and some women of DOS kept the practices secret from Mr. Raniere was unaware of DOS until it became public. She is solely responsible for DOS and its practices. Just as Nancy Salzman was intended to take the blame if ESP ran into legal trouble, Allison Mack was intended to take the blame for DOS, at least inside the Raniere-verse. And Meier (or his editors) agree that there is insufficient evidence to name Allison Mack as a central figure. My conclusion is that Sarah and the others told Meier that they believe that Allison Mack is a victim of DOS rather than a perpetrator, and so should not be publicly shamed. And surely Meier read enough of Frank Report to know to ask the question. Given the quotes from former insiders Sarah Edmondson, Anthony Ames, Mark Vicente, and Soukaina Mehdaoui in the NY Times article, there was ample opportunity for reporter Barry Meier to learn from them if they thought Allison Mack was a key figure if not the female leader of DOS. The narrative in Frank Report has been consistently that Allison Mack was the female founder of DOS, and that the brand “KR-AM” stands for Keith Raniere and Allison Mack. The only women named as perpetrators of DOS are Dr. ![]() Frank Report readers are likely puzzled that there was no mention of Allison Mack in the NY Times article. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |